Bucket List 2019-05-15T14:25:40+00:00

Accelerating the life sciences ecosystem

MedChemica Bucket List

Accelerating the life sciences ecosystem

The MedChemica Bucket List.

The MedChemica Bucket List

BucketListPapers 4/100 : Optimising pKa – The kernel of an idea about molecular interactions

The sulphonamides exert their bacteriostatic effect by competing with p-aminobenzoic acid.  To gain a deeper understanding of the structure-activity relationship, the activity and pKa of 50 sulfonamides were measured.  This required measurements that were as free from confounding influences as possible – an approach that prefigured much of the work undertaken in target-based drug discovery using all the latest tools of molecular biology since the 1990s. It was found (see graph) that the sulphonamides show a maximum in activity at pKas around 6. This is explained by a requirement for the sulphonamide to be in its ionised form (as might be expected for competition with p-aminobenzoic acid) but that the anionic form must not see the charge so stabilised by delocalisation that the SO2 does not carry a maximal negative charge. These are the kernel of key ideas about understanding and optimising molecular interactions with a binding site that underpin much modern drug design.

“Studies in Chemotherapy. VII. A Theory of the Relation of Structure to Activity of Sulfanilamide Type Compounds” by Bell and Roblin  J. Am. Chem. Soc.(1942), 64, , 2905-2917

#BucketListPapers #DrugDiscovery #MedicinalChemistry #BeTheBestChemistYouCanBe

BucketListPapers 3/100 : Hansch – Bringing Molecular Descriptors together

Various scientists had been gathering experimental data from which to extract descriptors that could be used to rationalise electronic (sigma values), size (molar refraction, MR and molecular weight, MW) and hydrophobic (pi values) effects caused by substituents, particularly on aromatic rings.  Hansch and co-workers aimed to bring all of these descriptors together in one place as a resource for those aiming to explore quantitative structure-activity relationships; an example of 4 groups that span the different types (polar vs hydrophobic, electron-donating vs withdrawing) is shown in the table.  Hansch et al.’s compilation of values remains a good starting point to understand the effects that various substituent types can exert, although Hansch and Leo went on to compile an even more comprehensive set: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm950902o. Some of our own work in matched molecular pairs has seen us effectively computing analogous values for the effect of aromatic substituents on solubility, plasma protein binding and other properties:  https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm0605233

 

Group Pi Sigma(meta) Sigma(para) MR MW
Me +0.56 -0.07 -0.17 5.65 15.0
F +0.14 +0.34 +0.06 0.92 19.0
NH2 -1.23 -0.16 -0.66 5.42 16.0
NO2 -0.28 +0.71 +0.78 7.36 46

 

“Aromatic Substituent Constants for Structure-Activity Correlations” by Hansch, Leo, Unger, Kim, Nikaitani and Lien.

DOI: 10.1021/jm00269a003

 

#BucketListPapers #DrugDiscovery #MedicinalChemistry #BeTheBestChemistYouCanBe

 

BucketListPapers 2/100 – Free / Wilson asks “have we made the best combination of substituents yet?”

In this paper Free and Wilson analyse the variation in biological activity caused by substituents at various positions in a series of molecules.  They apply a simple least squares fitting to attribute a contribution that each substituent is making to the observed activity. This analysis of variance has become a fundamental tool for medicinal chemistry.  It is assumed that the SAR is additive although the possibility of additive and non-additive groups is discussed. The method should always be considered whenever the question is asked “have we made the best combination of substituents yet?” and as such should be used in almost every drug discovery project.  Recent developments building on the Free and Wilson approach have explored how many compounds must be included in the data set to ensure satisfactory values for the contributions of each group, for example:

#BucketListPapers #DrugDiscovery #MedicinalChemistry #BeTheBestChemistYouCanBe

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm801070q

“A Mathematical Contribution to Structure-Activity Studies” by Free and Wilson. DOI:10.1021/jm00334a001

BucketListPapers 1/100 : The First Hint that Lipophilicity might be important….

Our first BucketListPaper is from 1899 and introduced the idea that the activity of anesthetics might correlate with  lipophilicity (as measured by partition into oil from water).  This first hint that lipophilicity might be a key property, as found by Overton and Meyer, kick-started the field of QSAR. The papers formed the basis of a theory of anesthesia, which still intrigues and stimulates new scientific studies.

#BucketListPapers #DrugDiscovery #MedicinalChemistry #BeTheBestChemistYouCanBe

  1. Overton E. Studien über die Narkose Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Allgemeinen Pharmakologie. Jena, Germany: Verlag von Gustav Fisher, 1901. Meyer H. Zur Theorie der Alkoholnarkose. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 1899;42: 109-18
  2. Graph abstracted by Campagna et al.: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra021261)

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00366.